Many views are held or have been expressed by religious organisations in relation to same-sex marriage. Although the majority of world religions oppose to same-sex marriage, the number of religious denominations that are conducting same-sex marriages have been increasing in recent times. Religious views on same-sex marriage are closely related to religious views on homosexuality.
They fear the new constitution could open the door to gay marriage. Ros Pascual and her husband would vote no to the new constitution, she said. They deliveredsignatures to the National Assembly, an unparalleled event in Cuba.
Published: July 15, News that the Anglican Church had voted against same sex-marriage came as a shock and huge disappointment to many churchgoers over the weekend. James Cathedral in the presence of at least two bishops and an archbishop last year. After a general synod vote approved same-sex marriage inArchbishop Colin Johnson issued guidelines for priests to perform them.
In the debate over gay marriage, opponents have many arguments that profess their belief that it should not be legal. These include many moral and religious reasons that point to a threat to the sacred institution of marriage. This debate brings up many questions.
Here is one way to answer a common question. Want more? Why are Mormons against gay people?
CNN United Methodist churches and clergy could face removal from the denomination if they do not affirm its stance against gay marriage and noncelibate LGBT clergy by The church reached the decision in a vote at a General Conference in St. Louis on Tuesday.
Support for same-sex marriage has steadily grown over the past 15 years. And today, support for same-sex marriage remains near its highest point since Pew Research Center began polling on this issue. Among people who are religiously unaffiliated, a solid majority have supported same-sex marriage since
It can seem like the whole world is having a gay old time, with conservative Christians the only ones refusing to party. It makes us look bad. It ruins our witness.
A large and growing body of scientific evidence indicates that the intact, married family is best for children. If we were asked to design a system for making sure that children's basic needs were met, we would probably come up with something quite similar to the two-parent ideal. Such a design, in theory, would not only ensure that children had access to the time and money of two adults, it also would provide a system of checks and balances that promoted quality parenting. The fact that both parents have a biological connection to the child would increase the likelihood that the parents would identify with the child and be willing to sacrifice for that child, and it would reduce the likelihood that either parent would abuse the child.